|  |  | ||
|  | 
 |  | |
|  | 
 |  | |
|  |  | ||
|  |  |  | |
|  | THE ARGUMENT
  AGAINST THE SECOND COMING (2Pe 3:4) 04-12-17 Grace Bible Church,
  Gillette, Wyoming Pastor Daryl Hilbert I.     STIRRED UP REMEMBRANCES
  (3:1-2) II.    SARCASM AGAINST THE 2ND COMING
  (3:3-4) A.    Sarcastic Remark (2Pe 3:4) 1.     Mockers
  have always been mocking God and His Word. But a resurgence of such an
  attitude is an earmark of the last days (2Pe 3:3). 2.     The motive for mocking God is that he
  desires to be independent of God’s authority in his life. In order to remove
  God’s authority, man attempts to remove God through ridicule. a.     I had
  motives for not wanting the world to have a meaning; and consequently assumed
  that it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying
  reasons for this assumption. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the
  world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics. He is
  also concerned to prove that there is no valid reason why he personally
  should not do as he wants to do. For myself, as no doubt for most of my friends,
  the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation
  from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it
  interfered with our sexual freedom. The supporters of this system claimed
  that it embodied the meaning - the Christian meaning, they insisted - of the
  world. There was one admirably simple method of confuting these people and
  justifying ourselves in our erotic revolt: we would deny that the world had
  any meaning whatever. (Aldous
  Huxley, Ends and Means) 3.     One of
  the chief targets for ridicule is the Second Coming of Christ, through which
  God will not only deliver His people, but will bring judgment against those
  who reject Him. This includes false teachers who reject biblical doctrine. B.    Second Coming 1.     Modern
  false teachers have not wanted to throw away their faith all together, but
  they did not want to denounce the world’s opinions either. So, they
  demythologized many if not all of the doctrines of the Bible, turning
  them into myths, analogies, and spiritual lessons rather than literal truths.
  In their minds, they eliminated the answer to the question, “where is the
  promise of His coming?,” by removing the subject of the question
  altogether.  a.     Adolf
  Von Harnack, wrote in his book, What is Christianity?,  “The kingdom of God comes by coming to the
  individual, by entering into his soul and laying hold of it.  True, the kingdom of God is the rule of
  God; but it is the rule of the holy God in the hearts of individuals; it is
  God himself in his power.  From
  this point of view everything that was dramatic in the external and
  historical sense has vanished; and gone, too, are all the hopes for the
  future b.      C.H. Dodd, who wrote one particular book
  called Parables of the kingdom.“That since the Lord did not in literal truth
  return on the clouds of heaven during the ‘30s of the first century, to
  expect Him thus to return in the twentieth century is to go contrary to
  primitive Christianity which is true Christianity.”  c.     Again, “The least inadequate myth of the
  goal of history is that which molds itself upon the great divine event of the
  past known in its concrete actuality and depicts its final issue in a form
  which brings time to an end and places man in eternity.  The least significant myth is the Second
  Coming of the Lord and the Last Judgment.” d.     Rudolf Bultmann, set out to make a life
  effort to “demythologize the New Testament.”  He concluded, “Among the
  mythological elements in the New Testament which must be reinterpreted and,
  therefore, no longer taken literally are the following: heaven, hell, the
  resurrection of Jesus Christ, the Second Coming of Christ, and the future day
  of judgment.”  … “This is mythical
  eschatology.  And so Paul must be
  demythologized.” 2.     However,
  the difficulty for false teachers and unbelievers is that the Second Coming
  has been literally prophesied and promised in Scripture.  a.     The
  Second Coming is the greatest theme of all prophecy. (Chafer, Major Bible Themes). b.     It was the first prediction by man (Jud
  1:14-15). c.     It is the last message of the Bible (Rev
  22:20).  d.     It is a dominant feature of Old Testament
  prophecy concerning the day of the Lord (Isa 13:6; Ezek 30:3; Joe 2:31; Oba
  1:15; Zep 1:14; Mal 4:5).  1)    The day
  of the Lord is not a particular day or event, but associated with the end
  time program of events such as the Rapture (1Co 1:8; 5:5; Phil 1:10), Second
  Coming (1Th 5:2), and Judgment (2 Pet 3:10). e.     It is a
  major theme of New Testament prophecy as taught by: 1)    Christ
  (Mat 24:30; 26:64; Mar 13:26; Luk 21:27).  2)    Luke (Act 1:11) 3)    Paul (Rom 11:26; 1Th 3:13; 1Th 5:1-4; 2Th
  1:7; 2Ti 4:1) 4)    James (Jam 5:8) 5)    Peter (2Pe 3:4) 6)    Jude (Jud 1:14-15) 7)    John throughout the Revelation (Rev 1:7;
  19:11, 14). C.    Sarcastic Argument 1.     Their
  argument is that that the Second Coming has not taken place anytime since the
  beginning of creation or since the fathers fell asleep, therefore,
  it will not happen in the future.  2.     They maintain that all continues (diamenō
  - remain unchanged, continue to exist (Gal 2:5; Luk 22:28) just as
  it was from the beginning, therefore, this is the way it will always be. This
  basic philosophy is called Uniformitarianism. It is also associated
  with Evolution (geological and biological). a.     Uniformitarianism,
  a geological theory propagated and popularized in the 1800's by geologist Sir
  Charles Lyell and directly refuting the geological doctrine of
  Catastrophism(the doctrine that at intervals in the earth’s history all
  living things have been destroyed by cataclysms, e.g., floods &
  earthquakes, and replaced by an entirely different population.) b.     Uniformitarianism is the assumption that
  the same natural laws and processes that operate in the universe now have
  always operated in the universe in the past and apply everywhere in the
  universe. (Gordon, B. L. (2013).
  "In Defense of Uniformitarianism". Perspectives on Science &
  Christian Faith. 65: 79-86.). c.     Stephen Meyer argument used Charles Lyell
  code to prove that DNA information comes form and Intelligent Designer (God) 1)    Information
  in biology is best understood as analogous to software code. Recall Bill
  Gates’s comment: “DNA is like a computer program but far, far more advanced
  than any software ever created.”… Here is the key question: How did the
  requisite information get into the DNA in the first place? …Just as useful
  computer code comes from programmers, so functional information comes from
  intelligence. It comes from mind…Charles Lyell, said that in trying to
  understand events in the remote past, we should look for causes now in
  operation. Mind fits that bill. Intelligence, or mind, or conscious activity,
  is the only known cause of the kind of sequence-specific, information-rich
  code that we see in biology. 3.     These
  false teachers were claiming that everything continues as it has from the
  beginning of creation and that nothing supernatural has taken place.  a.     Peter
  will remind the false teachers that something supernatural has already taken
  place and that was creation itself by the word of God (2Pe 3:5). b.     They should have been aware of
  supernatural events because of Christ’s First Advent some 23-24 years
  earlier. If Christ fulfilled the prophecies from 7-800 years earlier, what
  was a measly 24 years? c.     What was before Uniformitarianism?
  Peter’s writings. Peter told us Uniformitarianism would come in this passage,
  and that was about 2,000 years earlier. III.  OBSERVATIONS AND
  APPLICATIONS A.    The Second Coming is a
  motivator for Service 1.     That
  hope, according to the Word of God, is a motivator.  In fact, it may well be the greatest or
  among the greatest of all motivators for our joy, for our service, for our
  holiness.  We live anticipating that
  Jesus will return, that with Him He will bring His reward to give to those
  who are faithful, that with Him will come eternal joy to some degree and in
  some way based upon the level of commitment and faithfulness we have
  exhibited in our lives. (Mac Sermon) B.    The Second Coming is a
  motivator for Conduct 1.     If many
  who deny the Second Coming, do so in order to liberate their licentious
  lifestyle, then what does the Second Coming do for those who love the Lord
  and are waiting for His appearing? 2.     Peter tells us the obvious in 2Peter
  3:11. If we know the Lord is coming, and maybe in our day, bringing reward
  for the believer and judgment for the unbeliever, then we should live
  accordingly as those who are believers. Especially when we meditate on God’s
  retribution against sin. Therefore, our lives ought to be holy. C.    The Second Coming is a motivator
  for Belief. |  | |
|  | Grace Bible Church · 4000 E. Collins Rd ·  PO Box #3762 · Gillette, WY · (307) 686-1516 |  | |
|  |  |  |