Home

 Services

 Location

 Ministries

 Beliefs

 Studies

 Calendar

 Missions

 Pastor

 Contact

 Search

 

 

 

Grace Bible Church

4000 E. Collins Rd.   P.O. Box #3762   Gillette, WY  82717   (307) 686-1516

 

- Preaching the Living WORD through the Written WORD - 2 Tim 4:2 -

 

 

 

 

How We Received Our Bible

 (Transmission – Part 3)

Grace Bible Church, Gillette, Wyoming

Pastor Daryl Hilbert

 

I.        INTRODUCTION

 

A.      From the original autograph to the modern Bible extends an important link in the overall chain from “God to us” known as transmission. (Geisler & Nix, General Introduction To the Bible)

B.      It provides a credible answer to the question: Do Bible scholars today possess an accurate copy of the autographs? (ibid)

C.      In support of the integrity of the transmission, an overwhelming number of ancient documents must be presented. (ibid)

D.      There are not only countless manuscripts to support the integrity of the Bible (including the Old Testament since the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls), but a study of the procedures of preparation and preservation of the biblical manuscript copies reveals the fidelity of the transmission process itself. (ibid)

E.       For the New Testament, beginning with the second century ancient versions and manuscript fragments and continuing with abundant quotations of the Fathers and thousands of manuscript copies from that time to the modern versions of the Bible, there is virtually an unbroken line of testimony. (ibid)

F.       In fact, it may be concluded that no major document from antiquity comes into the modern world with such evidence of its integrity as does the Bible. (ibid)

 

II.      ORIGINAL AUTOGRAPHS

 

A.      “Original autographs” are the very originals that were penned by the prophets and apostles or their amanuenses (i.e. scribal secretary - Jer 36:27; Rom 16:22; Gal 6:11). These are the writings that were under the divine process of inspiration. When the autographs went from the originals to copies, the process is not called, “inspiration,” but “transmission.” Therefore, the divine process of inspiration only applies to the original autographs.

B.      It is almost universal among evangelical orthodox individuals and churches to make such distinction in their position and doctrinal statements.

1.       We do not assert that the common text, but only that the original autographic text, was inspired. (Archibald A. Hodge and Benjamin B. Warfield, Inspiration, pg. 42)

2.       The original autographs of the Scriptures were infallibly correct. (John R. Rice, Our God-Breathed Book -- The Bible, pg. 88)

3.       We believe the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be the verbally inspired Word of God, the final authority for faith and life, inerrant in the original writings, infallible and God-breathed. (II Tim. 3:16-17; II Peter 1:20,21). (Grace Bible Church, Gillette, Wyoming)

4.        “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God" (2 Tim.3:16), by which we understand that holy men of God "were moved by the Holy Spirit" to write the very words of Scripture (2 Pet.1:21). This divine inspiration extends equally and fully to all parts of the sixty-six books of the Bible as it appeared without error in the original manuscripts (Jn.10:35; Mt.5:18). (Faith Bible Church, Spring, Texas)

5.       Thus, the orthodox doctrine that the Bible is the infallible, inerrant Word of God in its original manuscripts has maintained itself from the first century to the present. (Geisler, N. L., & Nix, W. E. (1996, c1986). A General Introduction To The Bible, pg. 156).

C.      The copies that we possess cannot be technically said to be inspired. However, because we possess copies of the inspired original that are 98-99.9% pure, our copies can be considered “virtually” inspired.

1.       The Bible obviously did not come to us in its present form. Rather, as God inspired its human authors His words were written down in scrolls. These original manuscripts (or autographs as they are sometimes called) contained no errors, presenting perfectly the Word of God. However, there are no known originals left. What we possess today are thousands of copies of the original manuscripts (this includes fragments, which in some cases may contain only a verse or two). The problem is that while the manuscripts we study today agree to an incredible extent there do exist differences.  (Rev. Gary Gilley, Southern View Chapel)

2.       It is comforting to note, however, that scholars estimate that the text we have before us is between 98 and 99.9% pure — exactly as originally written. Only about 50 readings of any significance is in doubt, and none of these affect any basic doctrine. So we can have complete confidence in our text. (Rev. Gary Gilley, Southern View Chapel)

3.       Strictly speaking, only the "Autographs" (the original documents penned by the biblical authors) are inspired. (Copies of the original documents are VIRTUALLY inspired to the extent that they accurately reflect the original documents--and the evidence indicates that they DO accurately reflect the original documents to a very high degree.) (Ron Rhodes, The Complete Book of Bible Answers)

4.       No one manuscript or translation is inspired, only the original. However, for all intents and purposes, they are virtually inspired since, with today's great number of manuscripts available for scrutiny, the science of textual criticism can render us an adequate representation. Therefore, we can be assured that when we read the Bible we are reading the inspired Word of God. (Josh McDowell, Don Stewart, Reasons Skeptics Should Consider Christianity)

 

III.   PRESERVATION OF TRANSMISSION

 

A.      The Old Testament manuscripts fall into two general periods of evidence.

 

1.       The Talmudic Period (c. 300 B.C.–A.D. 500)

a)       By the time of the Maccabean revolt (168 B.C.), the Syrians had destroyed many of the existing manuscripts of the Old Testament.

b)       The Talmudic period produced many manuscripts which were preserved in synagogues and by private owners.

c)       In addition, The Dead Sea Scrolls (c. 167 B.C.–A.D. 133) have made an immense contribution to Old Testament critical study.

2.       The Masoretic Period (A.D. 500-1000)

a)       Masoretes are Jewish textual scribes of the fifth through ninth centuries A.D. who standardized the Hebrew text of the Old Testament, which is therefore called the Masoretic Text.

b)       The Masoretes understood the significance of God’s revelation to man in the form of the Scriptures. Because of such understanding, they were meticulous in copying the Scriptures. In fact, they had incorporated rules to guarantee that there were no errors in the transmission process. Samuel Davidson, in “The Hebrew Text of the Old Testament, p. 89, writes of these rules:

 [1] A synagogue roll must be written on the skins of clean animals,

[2] prepared for the particular use of the synagogue by a Jew.

[3] These must be fastened together with strings taken from clean animals.

[4] Every skin must contain a certain number of columns, equal throughout the entire codex.

[5] The length of each column must not extend over less than 48 nor more than 60 lines; and the breadth must consist of thirty letters.

[6] The whole copy must be first-lined; and if three words should be written without a line, it is worthless.

[7] The ink should be black, neither red, green, nor any other colour, and be prepared according to a definite recipe.

[8] An authentic copy must be the exemplar, from which the transcriber ought not in the least deviate.

[9] No word or letter, not even a yod, must be written from memory, the scribe not having looked at the codex before him. . . .

[10] Between every consonant the space of a hair or thread must intervene;

[11] between every new parashah, or section, the breadth of nine consonants;

[12] between every book, three lines.

[13] The fifth book of Moses must terminate exactly with a line; but the rest need not do so.

[14] Besides this, the copyist must sit in full Jewish dress,

[15] wash his whole body,

[16] not begin to write the name of God with a pen newly dipped in ink, [17] and should a king address him while writing that name he must take no notice of him.

 

B.      The New Testament manuscripts fall into four general periods of evidence.

 

1.       1st-3rd Cent.

 

a)       The first three centuries witnessed a composite testimony as to the integrity of the New Testament Scriptures. Because of the illegal position of Christianity, it cannot be expected that many, if any, complete manuscripts from that period are to be found. (Geisler, N. L., & Nix, A General Introduction To The Bible).

b)       Therefore, textual critics must be content to examine whatever evidence has survived, that is, nonbiblical papyri, biblical papyri, ostraca, inscriptions, and lectionaries that bear witness to the manuscripts of the New Testament . (ibid.)

 

2.       4th-5th Cent.

 

a)       The fourth and fifth centuries brought a legalization of Christianity and a multiplication of manuscripts of the New Testament. (ibid.)

b)       These manuscripts, on vellum and parchment generally, were copies of earlier papyri and bear witness to this dependence. (ibid.)

 

3.       6th-10th Cent.

 

a)       From the sixth century onward, monks collected, copied, and cared for New Testament manuscripts in the monasteries. (ibid.)

b)       This was a period of rather uncritical production, and it brought about an increase in manuscript quantity, but with a corresponding decrease in quality. (ibid.)

 

4.       11th Cent on

 

a)       After the tenth century, uncials (“inch high” formally printed large letters) gave way to miniscules (small cursive letters), and copies of manuscripts multiplied rapidly. (ibid.)

 

C.      Comparison to Classical Greek Manuscripts

 

a)       The classical writings of Greece and Rome illustrate the character of biblical manuscript preservation in a candid fashion. In contrast to the total number of the more than 5,300 partial and complete New Testament manuscripts known today, the Iliad of Homer has only 643, The Peloponnesian War of Thucydides only eight, while Tacitus’s works rely on but two manuscripts. (Geisler, N. L., & Nix, A General Introduction To The Bible)

b)       The abundance of biblical evidence would lead one to conclude with Sir Frederic Kenyon that “the Christian can take the whole Bible in his hand and say without fear or hesitation that he holds in it the true word of God, handed down without essential loss from generation to generation throughout the centuries.” (ibid.)

c)       Or, as he goes on to say, The number of manuscripts of the New Testament, of early translations from it, and of quotations from it in the oldest writers of the Church, is so large that it is practically certain that the true reading of every doubtful passage is preserved in some one or other of these ancient authorities. This can be said of no other ancient book in the world. (ibid.)

 

 

Return to How We Received Our Bible Menu